Thursday, January 03, 2013
Arminius on the Law of God
DISPUTATION
12-THE LAW OF GOD
Respondent: Dionysius Spranckhuysen
I. Law in general is defined, either from its End, "an
ordinance of right reason for the common and particular good of all and of each
of those who are subordinate to it, enacted by Him who has the care of the
whole community, and, in it, that of each individual." Or from its Form
and its Efficacy, "an ordinance commanding what must be done, and what
omitted; it is enacted by Him, who possesses the right of requiring obedience;
and it binds to obedience a creature who abounds in the use of reason and the
exercise of liberty, by the sacred promise of a reward and by the denunciation
of a punishment." It is likewise distinguished into Human and Divine. A
Divine law has God for its author, a Human law has man for its author; not that
any law enacted by man is choice and good, which may not be referred to God,
the author of every good; but because men deduce from the Divine law such
precepts as are accommodated to the state of which they have the charge and
oversight, according to its particular condition and circumstances. At present
we will treat upon the Divine law.
II. The Divine law may be considered, either as it is impressed on
the minds of men by the engrafted word; (Rom. ii, 14, 15;) as it is
communicated by words audibly pronounced, (Gal. ii, 17,) or as it is comprised
in writing. (Exod. xxxiv, 1.) These modes of legislation do not differ in their
entire objects: but they may admit of discrimination in this way, the first
seems to serve as a kind of foundation to the rest; but the two others extend
themselves further, even to those things which are commanded and forbidden. We
will now treat upon the law of God which is comprised in writing; and which is
also called "the law of Moses"; because God used him as a mediator to
deliver it to the children of Israel. (Mal. iv, 4; Gal. iii, 19.) But it is
three-fold according to the variety of the object, that is, of the works to be
performed. The first is called the Ethical, or Moral Law: (Exod. 20.) The
second, the Sacred or Ceremonial. The third the Political, Judicial or Forensic
Law.
III. The Moral Law is distributed through the whole of the
Scriptures of the Old and New Testament, and is summarily contained in the
Decalogue. It is an ordinance that commands those things which God accounts
grateful of themselves, and which it is his will to be performed by all men at
all times and in all places; and that forbids the contrary things. (1 Sam. xv,
22; Amos v, 21-24; Micah vi, 6-8.) It is therefore the perpetual and immutable
rule of living, the express image of the internal Divine conception; according
to which, God, the great lawgiver, judges it right and equitable that a
rational creature should always and in every place order and direct the whole
of his life. It is briefly contained in the love God and of our neighbour;
(Matt. xxii, 36-39;) whether partly consisting of those services which relate
to the love, honour, fear, and worship of God; (Mal. i, 6;) or partly
consisting of those duties which we owe to our neighbours, superiors,
inferiors, and equals: (Rom. 12,13, & 14;) in the wide circle of which are
also comprehended those things which every man is bound to perform to himself.
(Tit. ii, 11, 12.)
IV. The uses of the moral law are various, according to the
different conditions of man. (1.) The primary use, and that which was of itself
intended by God according to his love for righteousness and for his creatures,
was, that man by it might be quickened or made alive, that is, that he might
perform it, and by its performance might be justified, and might "of
debt" receive the reward which was promised through it. (Rom. ii, 13; x,
5; iv, 4.) And this use was accommodated to the primitive state of man, when
sin had not yet entered into the world. (2.) The first use in order of the
moral law, under a state of sin, is AGAINST man as a sinner, not only that it
may accuse him of transgression and guilt, and may subject him to the wrath of
God and condemnation; (Rom. iii, 19, 20;) but that it may likewise convince him
of his utter inability to resist sin and to subject himself to the law. (Rom.
7.) Since God has been pleased mercifully and graciously to treat with sinful
man, the next use of the law TOWARDS the sinner is, that it may compel him who
is thus convicted and subjected to condemnation, to desire and seek the grace
of God, and that it may force him to flee to Christ either as the promised or
as the imparted deliverer. (Gal. ii, 16, 17.) Besides, in this state of sin,
the moral law is serviceable, not only to God, that, by the dread of punishment
and the promise of temporal rewards, he may restrain men under its guidance at
least from the outward work of sin and from flagrant crimes; (1 Tim. i, 9, 10;)
but it is also serviceable to Sin, when dwelling and reigning in a carnal man
who is under the law, that it may inflame the desire of sin, may increase sin,
and may "work within him all manner of concupiscence." (Rom. vi,
12-14; vii, 5, 8, 11, 13.) In the former case, God employs the law through his
goodness and his love for civil and social intercourse among mankind. In the
latter case, it is employed through the malice of sin which reigns and has the
dominion.
V. (3.) The third use of the moral law is towards a man, as now
born again by the Spirit of God and of Christ, and is agreeable to the state of
grace, that it may be a perpetual rule for directing his life in a godly and
spiritual manner: (Tit. iii, 8; James ii, 8.) Not that man may be justified;
because for this purpose it is rendered "weak through the flesh" and
useless, even if man had committed only a single sin: (Rom. viii, 3.) But that
he may render thanks to God for his gracious redemption and sanctification,
(Psalm cxvi, 12, 13,) that he may preserve a good conscience, (1 Tim. i, 19,)
that he may make his calling and election sure, (2 Pet. i, 10,) that he may by
his example win over other persons to Christ, (1 Pet. iii, 1,) that he may
confound the devil, (Job 1 & 2,) that he may condemn the ungodly world,
(Heb. xi, 7,) and that through the path of good works he may march towards the
heavenly inheritance and glory, (Rom. ii, 7,) and that he may not only himself
glorify God, (1 Cor. vi, 20,) but may also furnish occasion and matter to
others for glorifying his Father who is in Heaven. (Matt. v, 16.)
VI. From these uses it is easy to collect how far the moral law
obtains among believers and those who are placed under the grace of Christ, and
how far it is abrogated. (1.) It is abrogated with regard to its power and use
in justifying: "For if there had been a law given which could have given
life, verily righteousness should have been by that law." (Gal. iii, 21.)
The reason why "it cannot give life," is, "because it is weak
through the flesh": (Rom. viii, 3) God, therefore, willing to deal
graciously with men, gave the promise and Christ himself, that the inheritance
through the promise and by faith of Jesus Christ might be given to them that
believe. But the law which came after the promise, could neither "make the
latter of none effect," (for it was sanctioned by authority,) nor could it
be joined or super- added to the promise, that out of this union righteousness
and life might be given. (Gal. iii, 16-18, 22.) (2.) It is abrogated with
regard to the curse and condemnation: For "Christ, being made a curse for
us, hath redeemed us from the curse of the law"; (Gal. iii, 10-13;) and
thus the law is taken away from sin, lest its "strength" should be to
condemn. (1 Cor. xv, 55, 56.) (3.) The law is abrogated and taken away from
sin, so far as "sin, having taken occasion by the law, works all manner of
concupiscence" in the carnal man, over whom sin exercises dominion. (Rom.
vii, 4-8.) (4.) It is abrogated, with regard to the guidance by which it urged
man to do good and to refrain from evil, through a fear of punishment and a
hope of temporal reward. (1 Tim. i, 9, 10; Gal. iv, 18.) For believers and
regenerate persons "are become dead to the law by the body of
Christ," that they may be the property of another, even of Christ; by
whose Spirit they are led and excited in newness of life, according to love and
the royal law of liberty. (1 John v, 3, 4; James ii, 8.) Whence it appears, that
the law is not abrogated with respect to the obedience which must be rendered
to God; for though obedience be required under the grace of Christ and of the
Gospel, it is required according to clemency, and not according to strict legal
rigor. (1 John iii, 1, 2.)
VII. The Ceremonial Law is that which contains the precepts
concerning the outward worship of God; which was delivered to the Jewish
church, and was accommodated to the times in which the church of God was
"as a child" under "the promise" and the Old Testament.
(Gal. iv, 1-3.) It was instituted not only to typify, to prefigure and to bear
witness by sealing; (Heb. viii, 5; x, 1;) but likewise for the discipline, or
good order which was to be observed in ecclesiastical meetings and acts. (Col.
ii, 14; Psalm xxvii, 4.) Subservient to the former purpose were circumcision,
the Pascal Lamb, sacrifices, sabbaths, sprinklings, washings, purifications,
consecrations and dedications of living creatures. (Col. ii, 11; 1 Cor. v, 7.)
To the latter purpose, that of church discipline, were the distinct
functions of the Priests, the Levites, the Singers, and the porters, or
door-keepers, the courses or changes in their several duties, and the
circumstances of the places and times in which these sacred acts were to be
severally performed. (1 Chron. 24, 25, & 26.)
VIII. The use of this ceremonial law was, (1.) That it might
retain that ancient people under the hope and expectation of the good things
which had been promised. (Heb. x, 1- 3.) This use it fulfilled by various
types, figures and shadows of persons, things, actions, and events; (7, 9,
& 10;) by which not only were sins testified as in "a hand-writing
which was against them," (Col. ii, 14,) that the necessity of the promise
which had been given might be understood; but likewise the expiation and
promised good things were shewn at a distance, that they might believe the
promise would assuredly be fulfilled. (Heb. ix, 8-10; Col. ii, 17; Heb. x, 1.)
And in this respect, since the body and express form of those types and shadows
relate to Christ, the ceremonial law is deservedly called "a school-master
to bring the Jews unto Christ." (Gal. iii, 24.) (2.) That it might
distinguish from other nations the Children of Israel, as a people sanctified
to God on a peculiar account, and that it might separate them as "a middle
wall of partition"; (Ephes. ii, 14, 15;) yet so as that even strangers
might be admitted to a participation in it by circumcision. (Exod. xii, 44;
Acts ii, 10.) (3.) That while occupied in this course of operas religious
services, they might not invent and fabricate other modes of worship, nor
assume such as were in use among other nations; and thus they were preserved
pure from idolatry and superstition, to which they had the greatest propensity,
and for which occasions were offered on every side by those nations who were
contiguous, as well as by those who dwelt amongst them. (Deut. 12; xxxi, 16,
27-29.)
IX. The ceremonial law was abrogated by the cross, the death and
the resurrection of Christ, by his ascension into heaven and the mission of the
Holy Ghost, by the sun’s dispersion of the shadows, and by the entrance of
"the body which is of Christ" into their place, (Col. ii, 11, 12, 14,
17,) which is the full completion of all the types. (Heb. viii, 1-6.) But the
gradations to be observed in its abrogation must come under our consideration:
In the first moment it was abrogated with regard to the necessity and utility
of its observance, every obligatory right being at once and together taken from
it: in that instant it ceased to live, and became dead. (Gal. iv, 9, 10; 1 Cor.
vii, 19; ix, 19, 20; 2 Cor. iii, 13- 16.) Afterwards it was actually to be
abolished. This was ejected partly, by the teaching of the Apostles among
believers, who by degrees understood "Christ to be the end of the
law," and of that which was then abolished; they abstained therefore
voluntarily from the use of that law. Its abolition was also ejected in part,
by the power of God, in the destruction of Jerusalem and of the temple, in
which was the seat of religion, and the place appointed for performing those
religious observances, against the contumacy of the unbelieving Jews. From this
period the legal ceremonies began to be mortiferous, though in the intermediate
space which had elapsed between the death of Christ and the destruction of
Jerusalem, these rites, even in the judgment of the apostles themselves,
might be tolerated, but only among the Jews, and with a proviso, that they
should not be imposed on the Gentiles: (Acts xvi, 3; xv, 28; xxi, 21-26; Gal.
ii, 3, 11, 12;) which toleration must itself be considered as being tantamount
to a new institution.
X. The Judicial Law is that which God prescribed by Moses to the
Children of Israel, of whom He was in a peculiar manner the king. (Exod. 21,
22, 23, &c.) It contained precepts about the form of the political
government to be exercised in civil society, for procuring the benefit both of
natural and spiritual life, by the preservation and exaction of the outward
worship and of the external discipline commanded in moral and ceremonial law,
such as concerned magistrates, contracts, division of property, judgments,
punishments, &c. (Deut. xvii, 15.) These laws may appropriately be referred
to two kinds: (1.) Some of them, with regard to their substance are of general
obligation, though with regard to some circumstances they are peculiar to the
Jewish commonwealth. (2.) Others belong simply to a particular right or
authority. (Deut. xv, 1, 2; vi, 19.)
XI. The uses of this judicial law also were three: (1.) That the
whole community of the Children of Israel might be regulated by a certain rule
of public equity and justice; that it might be "as a city that is compact
together," (Psalm cxxii, 3,) or as a body "which is knit
together" according to all and each of its parts," "by the
joints and sinews" of the precepts prescribed in this law. (2.) That the
Israelites might, by this law, be distinguished from other nations who had
their own laws. Thus was it the will of God, that this his people should have
nothing in common with other nations, wherever this was possible according to
the nature of things and of man himself. These two uses related to the existing
condition of the Jewish commonwealth. (3.) It had reference to future things,
and was typical of them For all that state, and the whole kingdom and its
administration, the chiefs of administration, the judges and kings, prefigured
Christ and his kingdom, and its spiritual administration. Psalm 2; Ezek. xxxiv,
23, 24.) In this respect also the judicial law may be called "a
schoolmaster to bring the Jews to Christ."
XII. This law, so far as it had regard to Christ, was universally
abrogated. No kingdom, no nation, no administration, serves now typically to
figure Christ and his kingdom or administration. For his kingdom, which is the
kingdom of heaven and not of this world, has already come, and he has come into
his kingdom. (Matt. iii, 2; xvi, 28; John xviii, 36; Matt. xi, 11.) But with
respect to its simple observance, this Judicial Law is neither forbidden nor
prescribed to any people, nor is it of absolute necessity to be either observed
or omitted. Those matters are accepted which are of universal obligation, and
founded in natural equity. For it is necessary, that they be strictly observed,
in every place and by all persons. And those things in the judicial law
which relate to Christ as it respects the very substance and principal end,
cannot be lawfully used by any nation.
COROLLARY
The doctrine of the Papists respecting
Councils and of Works of Supererogation, derogates from the perfection of the
Divine commands.
Labels:
Arminius,
Christian Living,
Law,
Moral Accountability,
Sin
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
It warms me heart (spoken like an Irishman) to see primary writings of Arminius on-line!
William, good to see you on-line again. If more people paid attention to primary sources there would be a lesser need for corrective apologetics.
Post a Comment